Easy points...pissed off citizens
Such is the power of the blogosphere, that I heard about this story in my own home area, from a man living in Tennessee.
Instapundit thinks that the practice of Fairfax county police raiding bars and giving public drunkeness tickets is tacky. I'd call it worse than tacky, but I can't think of a single word that conveys my disgust over such paternalistic tactics effectively.
I remember working late shifts at the Amphora in Vienna, and the police would come in, head to the smoking section, and card every patron in the smoking section who appeared to be under 30, to combat underage smoking - which may be a problem, but ranks far lower on my list of society's ills than child rape.
I've talked to a lot of policemen who work in this area, and I don't think the police are doing this because they're smallminded, petty, jackbooted thugs who enjoy grinding the defenseless populace under the heel of authority (although I've certainly met a few who do); the police do cigarette and 'public drunkeness' raids because the police in this area work on a point system. You don't have to have a certain quota of speeders, or robbers each month, but you do have to get a certain number of points, and the number of points you get varies based on the type of crime. If all you have to do is garner a certain number of points, you could just set up a speed trap in a school zone for the day, and have all the points you need to make for your entire month in one day. That's an actual example.
DEA raids medical marijuana distributors in California, instead of going after states that think they have a pot problem. BATF concentrates on legal gun dealers, operating in the open, instead of concentrating on getting guns out of the hands of criminals. The police in Fairfax county spend their time raiding peaceful bar patrons, but won't chase down a drunk man driving a stolen vehicle that rear-ended me in the busiest pedestrian district in Alexandria (but I'm not bitter). As long as there is small time shit out there for the police to futz around with, that's what they'll do - because it is easier, and safer, than going after violent criminals who leave behind victims.
I don't claim to know how to fix it, but I have some ideas. If you've gotta keep a point system, fine, but weight the scoring so that there is strong incentive for the police to go after crimes that have victims first - say 1 point for any traffic violation versus 1000 for a rape. Perhaps some simplification of the law would be in order too. Right now, there are a whole lot of laws on the books that go unenforced - unless the cop is in a pissy mood. Witness the 'gentleman's 10' - the commonly held belief that a cop won't ticket you unless you're doing better than 10 over the limit.
When I was contracting to the government, one of the many jobs I did involved teaching analytical risk management to security professionals in the intel community. What we were trying to do - sadly, pretty much in vain - was hammer through these government types' heads that, given the world we live in today, with the myriad threats we face, and the limited budget we have for security, you
have to prioritize your threats, and apply countermeasures effectively.
So... is public drunkeness one of the greatest threats Fairfax county faces today? If you think "yes", raise your hand and I'll come over and hit you on the head with a hammer because you are a retard. In a county that has seen everything from gang-related shootings, and fundraising for islamic terrorist groups, to a 12 year old boy attempting to form a prostitution ring, I'd place even the drunkest patrons of our local bars near the bottom of the list of threats. So.... a little prioritization, please.